Abstract: . . .  and Products, 2000. 11: p. 97-106. [46] Hall, D.O. and J.I. House, Biomass energy in Western Europe to 2050. Land Use Policy, 1995. 12(1): p. 37-48. [47] Lal, R., J.M. Kimble, R.F. Follett, and C.V. Cole, The potential of U.S. cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. 1998: Ann Arbor Press, Sleeping Bear Press, Inc. USA. [48] Williams, R.H., Variants of a low CO2-emitting energy supply system (LESS) for the world: Prepared for the IPCC Second Assessment Report Working Group . . .
. . .  carbon sequestration in the soil. 1999, Dutch National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change. 82 [34] Ford-Robertson, J., K. Robertson, and P. Maclaren, Modellin the effect of landuse practices on greenhouse gas emissions and sinks in New Zealand. Environmental Science & Policy, 1999. 2: p. 135-144. [35] UN-ECE/FAO, Forest resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand (industrialized temperate/boreal countries). UNECE/FAO contribution to the global . . .
. . .  practices intended to achieve high environmental benefits on CRP program lands, while the high price case assumes high productivity management practices. Around 3 and 5 Mha of the 7 Mha CRP land available was used for energy crops production in the low and high energy crop price cases respectively. xii [42] xiii Calculated based on [42, 44] xiv Approx. 97 percent of removals are from plantations xv [43] 84  . . .
. . .  Mitigation Options. 1995, Pacific Northwest Laboratories. [49] Bauen A. and Kaltschmitt K., Current use and potential of solid biomass in developing countries and their implications for CO2 emissions, Proceedings of the 1st World Conference and Exhibition on Biomass for Energy and Industry, 59 June 2000, Seville, Elsevier Science (in press) 83 i Unless specified otherwise, data are taken from Forest Resources Assessment 2000, http://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/index.jsp ii Unless specified otherwise, data . . .
. . .  intended to achieve high environmental benefits on CRP program lands, while the high price case assumes high productivity management practices. Around 3 and 5 Mha of the 7 Mha CRP land available was used for energy crops production in the low and high energy crop price cases respectively. xii [42] xiii Calculated based on [42, 44] xiv Approx. 97 percent of removals are from plantations xv [43] 84  . . .
. . .  assumes management practices intended to achieve high environmental benefits on CRP program lands, while the high price case assumes high productivity management practices. Around 3 and 5 Mha of the 7 Mha CRP land available was used for energy crops production in the low and high energy crop price cases respectively. xii [42] xiii Calculated based on [42, 44] xiv Approx. 97 percent of removals are from plantations xv [43] 84  . . .
--3000,6,250,3163,204366