Abstract: . . .  (CVBP) If at any point these paths open, the process jumps to here. Construction permits still required. Regulatory = action or decision PSD Variance that would allow commercial operation (25 tph) May 1, 2005 Q4 2004 Go to E Action or = decision by Alliant or CVBP June 2005 Commercial operations begins at 12.5 tph. B Q4 2003 Cofire test 2 data indicate that cofire test 3 emissions would not exceed PSD thresholds, but emissions from commercial operations might. CVBP decided to proceed directly to . . .
. . .  permit process, IDNR issues or denies request for variance to allow cofire test 2. s ue iss 3a PSD thresholds not exceeded in cofire test 2. Data indicate that PSD thresholds could be exceeded in cofire test 3 (but not likely). April 2002 CVBP submits Environmental Permitting Plan to the IDNR. IDNR issues or denies construction permits for equipment to be constructed during campaign 2. de nie s CVBP begins PSD revision process. Go to A 4 Cofire test 2 terminated prematurely because PSD thresholds were . . .
. . .  being exceeded. Decide if project should be terminated. dec term ide to inat e Paths that follow Cofire Test 2, given emissions test outcomes other than the best possible outcome. CVBP terminates. Equipment dismantled. 19 Alliant Energy's Proposed Air Permitting Plan for the Chariton Valley Biomass Project (CVBP) If at any point these paths open, the process jumps to here. Construction permits still required. Regulatory = action or decision PSD Variance that would allow commercial operation (25 tph) . . .
. . .  exceeded. Decide if project should be terminated. dec term ide to inat e Paths that follow Cofire Test 2, given emissions test outcomes other than the best possible outcome. CVBP terminates. Equipment dismantled. 19 Alliant Energy's Proposed Air Permitting Plan for the Chariton Valley Biomass Project (CVBP) If at any point these paths open, the process jumps to here. Construction permits still required. Regulatory = action or decision PSD Variance that would allow commercial operation (25 tph) May 1, 2005 . . .
. . .  been reduced by more than the reduction in feed S would suggest. The reason for this extra emissions benefit (sometimes observed) is the high K (potassium) content of the switchgrass – the increase in SO2 capture is the result of potassium sulphate formation. 26  . . .
. . .  greater-than-expected. SO2 emissions have been reduced by more than the reduction in feed S would suggest. The reason for this extra emissions benefit (sometimes observed) is the high K (potassium) content of the switchgrass – the increase in SO2 capture is the result of potassium sulphate formation. 26  . . .
--3000,6,250,2997,51769