|
Abstract: . . . the peak power numbers > are often very misleading and give a false impression of the true costs and > returns. Re: Solar−Thermal vs Photo−electric 1 sci.energy.hydrogen: Re: Solar−Thermal vs Photo−electric Using $/watt without a projected availability is ludicrous. And trying to 'average' a 25KW plant's . . . . . . can run 24/7. Or one that costs $0.75/watt might not be viable if it runs only 700hours/year with a staff of 50 full−time engineering people. daestrom Re: Solar−Thermal vs Photo−electric 2 . . . --596,2,149,645,2979
|