|
Abstract: . . . false impression of the true costs > and > returns. Also, be very weary of new materials like buckyballs and carbon Re: Solar−Thermal vs Photo−electric 1 sci.energy.hydrogen: Re: Solar−Thermal vs Photo−electric > nano tubes. These thing are not likely to every be employed in > manufactured > goods because of . . . . . . day. Average for the "mid−US" is also 4 kWh. Note that from December−January average daily insolation will be close to 2 kWh http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/ Re: Solar−Thermal vs Photo−electric 2 . . . --621,2,155,652,3106
|