Abstract: . . .  this Solicitation. 4.2.4 The qualifications and experience of personnel assigned by the bidder to the contract with emphasis on documented experience in successfully completing required services of a similar size and scope to those required by this Solicitation. 4.2.5 The overall ability of the bidder, as judged by the State, to gear-up, undertake and successfully complete the contract within the required schedule or on time. 4.2.6 The cost of the project, taking into account both the bidder’s Cost . . .
. . .  ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal or State agency, and (2) The bidder and/or any of its principals ____ have, ___ have not, within a three-year period proceeding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a Federal, state, or local government contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission . . .
. . .  PROPOSAL EVALUATION COMMITTEE The Board is establishing an advisory committee to assist it and the NJDEP in review of proposals and review of construction and performance of project(s) receiving funding. This nonaffiliated group of experts in the field of renewable energy generation projects will assist in the review of proposals and make its recommendations to Board Staff, in consultation with the NJDEP. The Board will have final authority in awarding funds. 4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA The following evaluation . . .
. . .  EVALUATION COMMITTEE The Board is establishing an advisory committee to assist it and the NJDEP in review of proposals and review of construction and performance of project(s) receiving funding. This nonaffiliated group of experts in the field of renewable energy generation projects will assist in the review of proposals and make its recommendations to Board Staff, in consultation with the NJDEP. The Board will have final authority in awarding funds. 4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA The following evaluation criteria, . . .
. . .  ____________________________________________ (Date) (3) 18 APPENDIX C - - ENVIRONMENT ADJUSTMENT List the NOx emissions of the technology, per MWh. List the sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions of the technology, per MWh. List the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of the technology, per MWh. List the land usage, in acreage, of the proposal. List the water usage of the proposal, in gallons per MWh. List the wastewater disposal related to the proposal, in gallons per MWh. List the solid waste generated, related to the proposal, . . .
. . .  Jersey electric generation average emissions (EGRID 1999 average data). 4.2.7 The amount of funding requested as a percentage of the total project cost. 4.2.8 The output/capacity of the project, in MWhs and MWs. 4.2.9 The proposed location of the REG projects, siting and permitting. 4.2.10 Consideration of the goals with the State Development and Redevelopment Plan regarding land uses prescribed areas. 15 4.2.11 The mix of technologies. 4.2.12 The environmental attributes of the proposed technology . . .
--3000,6,250,3483,46471